The Regret You Can’t Feel Yet

Back to Articles

In 1994 a man named David Egelhoff got divorced. About two months later he died in a car accident.

He had a pension and a life insurance policy through his job, and the beneficiary form on both of them still named his ex-wife. He’d had two months to change it. Which is to say he’d had two months to do a thing that takes about eleven minutes, and he hadn’t gotten to it.

His children sued, and they won in Washington, which had a law on the books saying divorce automatically cancels your ex as beneficiary. That sounds like the exact law you’d write to stop this from happening. Then the case went to the Supreme Court, and in 2001 the Court held, seven to two, that the federal law governing employer retirement plans overrides the state one. The form controls. The forty-six thousand dollars of insurance money had already been paid to his ex-wife, and the judgment his children had won was reversed.

Nobody in that story made a bad decision. That’s the part I keep going back to. There was no afternoon where David Egelhoff sat down, weighed his options, and picked wrong. There was a form he meant to get to.

Why nobody gets to it

So why don’t we get to it?

Kahneman and Tversky came at that question in 1982. They gave people a scenario with two investors. Same year, and both of them end up twelve hundred dollars short of where they could have been. The first one thought about moving his money and left it alone. The second one moved his, and that’s what cost him. Same ending, same number. And when you ask people which one feels worse, it isn’t close. Ninety-two percent said the one who acted.

Worth being precise about that scenario, because it gets retold wrong constantly. Neither investor lost twelve hundred dollars. Both of them simply failed to gain it. The regret is measured against a road not taken, not against a hole in the account.

That’s the whole machine. Doing nothing comes with a defense attached. You didn’t choose this, the market did it to you. Move the money and have it go badly, and that one is yours, with your fingerprints on it, and you get to carry it around.

It’s a little like driving with the check engine light on. You never decide to wreck the engine. You just don’t decide to go to the mechanic. Those feel completely different from the inside, right up until the engine stops.

The freeze wears a disguise

Inaction almost never shows up as inaction. It shows up as being reasonable.

I’ll look at it after the holidays. I want to see what the Fed does in September. My brother-in-law says this is a terrible time to buy anything. The market feels high.

And the most expensive version of this is the one where the reason to wait is actually a good one. In the summer of 2026, roughly nine thousand New York City police officers were sitting on exactly that problem. A bill had passed both houses of the New York State legislature in June that would change how their final average salary gets calculated. As of this writing it had not been delivered to the Governor, and nobody knew when it would be, or whether it would be signed at all. So an officer with nineteen years in had a live question about when to put in their papers, and no way to answer it, because the answer was sitting on somebody else’s desk. (If that’s your situation, you can run the tier math yourself on the free NYPD pension calculator.)

Here is the part worth sitting with. The state actuary’s average estimate of the change was about a quarter of one percent. The paralysis was enormous, and the number was small.

Retire and be wrong, and it’s your decision. Wait and be wrong, and it was the legislature’s. Waiting is a bet that has the great advantage of not feeling like one. None of which tells anyone what to do with their papers, a real decision with real numbers behind it that belongs in a conversation with someone who can see your actual situation. The point is narrower: waiting is also a choice, and it should have to defend itself like every other choice.

“Bad action is loud. Bad inaction is silent. And we correct for the loud one.”

The invoice that never arrives

Nobody wakes up and says, I have decided to leave forty thousand dollars in a checking account for six years. But that is what happens. It just happens one Tuesday at a time.

And the bill for it arrives with no receipt attached. Sell something and watch it double, and the market sends you a very loud invoice. Never buy the thing at all, and nothing shows up in the mail. There is no statement line for the portfolio you didn’t build. You end up with less money and no clear story about where it went, which is a strange way to lose.

This is a cousin of the problem in Later Is the Most Expensive Word in Money, but it is not the same animal. That one is about preferring now to later. This one is about dodging blame. Same symptom, different engine, and they need different fixes.

The scoreboard flips later

Then there is the other half of the research, which almost nobody quotes.

In the mid-1990s, Gilovich and Medvec came at regret from the opposite end. Instead of asking people about last quarter, they asked about a whole life. What do you actually regret? Not the sting that fades in a month, but the one still sitting there decades later.

The answer came back reversed. Over a long enough stretch, the things people wish they’d done outnumber the things they wish they hadn’t, by close to two to one. Sixty-three percent against thirty-seven in their count. Later replication work suggests the effect is more conditional than that first paper made it look, but the direction has held.

Both findings hold at the same time, and that is the trap. In the short run, acting hurts more. Over a life, not acting wins by a wide margin. The difference is which one you can feel on the day you’re deciding, and it’s always the short one.

Two things that get people unstuck

The first is to sort your list by what’s reversible. Most financial decisions are not one-way doors. You can change a contribution rate next month. You can update a beneficiary form in about eleven minutes. When you split the list into what you can undo and what you can’t, the permanent pile turns out to be short, and that short pile is where the careful thinking belongs. The rest of it you’ve been treating as permanent, and it’s a form.

The second is to write down what happens if you do nothing. Not the fear, the arithmetic. If this cash sits here for five more years, where does it land. If I never touch this beneficiary designation, who gets the money, and is that still the person I’d pick. Neither of these is clever. They work because vagueness is what the freeze runs on, and a written number is not vague.

The one that stays

The regrets that last are rarely dramatic. Nobody in that research described a catastrophe. They described a job they didn’t take, a conversation they didn’t have, a thing they always meant to get to. Ordinary items that seemed postponable at the time, because they were.

Money works the same way. Whatever bothers you in 2041 probably won’t be a trade that went sideways. It’s more likely the eight years an account sat there while you waited to feel ready.

You will not feel ready. That isn’t what ready is for.